DWF logo

Search

DWF logo

            Disability Discrimination: Can a "vanishing dismissal" amount to a detriment?

            In the case of Jakkhu v Network Rail the Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) considered the question of whether a dismissal can amount to a detriment, even if it is subsequently retracted.

            Date: 21/11/2019

            Background

            The Claimant was at risk of redundancy based on a genuine reorganisation by the Respondent. The Claimant had a history of sickness absences relating to his disability and whilst on sick leave, attended a redundancy notice meeting. The Claimant confirmed that he would rather take redundancy than be considered for an alternative role at a different location. He was served with notice of redundancy, which was to take effect on 24 September 2014, and the Claimant remained on sick leave until this time.

            After the dismissal of the Claimant, it came to the Respondent's attention that by serving the notice of redundancy, it had breached a trade union agreement that no compulsory redundancies would take place until 31 December 2014. The Respondent accordingly informed the Claimant that it was extending the notice period until after this date. The redundancy notice was then later retracted, and the Claimant returned to an alternative role. Following a series of events, the Claimant subsequently brought claims in the Employment Tribunal for direct disability discrimination, unfavourable treatment arising in consequence of disability, and victimisation.

            The Decision 

            The Employment Tribunal had initially treated the dismissal as a 'vanishing dismissal' on the basis that it had been extinguished by the Claimant's reinstatement. It was held that there had not been any less favourable treatment, nor were they able to see any difference in treatment that was due to the Claimant’s disability. 

            However, when considering this decision, the EAT held that that there had been a failure to properly consider what the actual detriment was. The EAT considered that the Tribunal had erroneously viewed the circumstances through the prism of the case law on 'dismissal', as opposed to considering whether the act of dismissal itself could establish a detriment. 

            It was decided that irrespective of whether the dismissal was subsequently withdrawn, the act of dismissal itself gave rise to a detriment for the purposes of section 13 (direct discrimination) and section 15 (discrimination arising in consequence of disability) of the Equality Act 2010 ("EqA"). 

            Comment

            Despite subsequent reinstatement, which would often render a dismissal a 'vanishing dismissal', this case makes it clear that the act of dismissal itself can establish a detriment for the purposes of disability discrimination. This was found to be irrespective of whether any pecuniary loss had been caused to the Claimant, and the fact that dismissal had later been withdrawn. It is clear that the Employment Tribunal is required to adopt a broad approach to its consideration of what constitutes a detriment and engaging with this issue to ensure section 136 EqA relating to burden of proof is properly applied in disability discrimination cases.

            Authored by Rosalind McArdle and Joanne Frew.

            Related people

            Joanne Frew

            • Partner // Head of Employment (Manchester)

            We use cookies to give you the best user experience on our website. Please let us know if you accept our use of cookies.

            Manage cookies

            Your Privacy

            When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. We mainly use this information to ensure the site works as you expect it to, and to learn how we can improve the experience in the future. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalised web experience.
            Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change permissions. However, blocking some types of cookies may prevent certain site functionality from working as expected

            Functional cookies

            (Required)

            These cookies let you use the website and are required for the website to function as expected.

            These cookies are required

            Tracking cookies

            Anonymous cookies that help us understand the performance of our website and how we can improve the website experience for our users. Some of these may be set by third parties we trust, such as Google Analytics.

            They may also be used to personalise your experience on our website by remembering your preferences and settings.

            Marketing cookies

            These cookies are used to improve and personalise your experience with our brands. We may use these cookies to show adverts for our products, or measure the performance of our adverts.