DWF logo

Search

DWF logo

            Brand or insurance protection – worrying developments in food retail

            In the Food and Hospitality sectors, we are starting to see a change in the type of claims that are made, and the ways in which our clients want to see these claims dealt with.

            Date: 01/11/2019

            When we think about accidents in restaurants, as Defendant Claims Handlers, we typically know what to expect. We are all too familiar with reports of customers or employees slipping as a result of a spillage, or allegations of food poisoning after a meal.  As digital converges with bricks and mortar as well as a growing diverse population, we are starting to see a change in both the sort of claims that are starting to be made, as well as the ways in which our clients want to see these claims dealt with.

            So what do we mean by this? In most accidents the injury is very physical in nature, a broken bone, or a sprained ankle. But what about customers who are of a certain religious denomination and cannot consume certain meats like beef or pork, and are accidentally served meals containing these ingredients? 

            In a situation like this, where the injuries are more psychological in nature, we would investigate the matter the same as any other; has a breach of the duty of care occurred? And, can causation be established? 

            That is not to say that the conventional slip and trip cases are a thing of the past, and in most circumstances, the Food Business Operator (FBO) will want to defend these matters wherever they can. However, we are seeing a significant rise in FBOs looking to resolve the matter directly with the Claimant, often as an extension of good customer service. 

            Interestingly, the reason for this is often less about the commercial balance between the cost to settle and the cost and uncertainty of defending litigated claims, but more about the indirect cost of the reputational damage of adverse reviews on social media or review sites. This is of course a legitimate concern and it is natural for any business to want to protect its brand, however, an unintended consequence of this can be that it sets a precedent where possibly spurious claims go un- challenged and allows low level dubious claims or even fraud to grow unfettered.  

            This leads to a more prosaic problem. In this conflict between brand protection and insurance indemnity who will prevail? Who should prevail?

            1. Will brand protection on social media continue to be a priority even in the face of spurious claims?
            2. Will Insureds continue to prefer to fund compensation out of their own pockets when they have perfectly good indemnity cover and legal advice available to allow them to pay nothing at all?
            3. Will this only serve to open the floodgates making social media focused brands fair game for compensation hungry carpetbaggers or as some commentary on a US class action for sugary products put it: 'a lawyer led shake down'?
            4. When will Insurers lose patience and seek to enforce the terms of their policies?

            We, together with our specialist products liability and regulatory lawyers, are here to support our FBOs through these muddied waters. We must guide them through this changing environment and seek to uphold the values of law and evidence, and strike the right balance between brand protection and commercial expediency.  

            Learn more about our claims experience for the food and hospitality sector

            Learn more about our products liability and regulatory experience in the food and hospitality sector

            Related people

            Lisa Heathcote

            • Head of UK GL

            We use cookies to give you the best user experience on our website. Please let us know if you accept our use of cookies.

            Manage cookies

            Your Privacy

            When you visit any web site, it may store or retrieve information on your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. We mainly use this information to ensure the site works as you expect it to, and to learn how we can improve the experience in the future. The information does not usually directly identify you, but it can give you a more personalised web experience.
            Because we respect your right to privacy, you can choose not to allow some types of cookies. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change permissions. However, blocking some types of cookies may prevent certain site functionality from working as expected

            Functional cookies

            (Required)

            These cookies let you use the website and are required for the website to function as expected.

            These cookies are required

            Tracking cookies

            Anonymous cookies that help us understand the performance of our website and how we can improve the website experience for our users. Some of these may be set by third parties we trust, such as Google Analytics.

            They may also be used to personalise your experience on our website by remembering your preferences and settings.

            Marketing cookies

            These cookies are used to improve and personalise your experience with our brands. We may use these cookies to show adverts for our products, or measure the performance of our adverts.